Home/Bach motors/The piston engine

Why a piston engine?

Efficiency, cost, and performance for applications under 800 kW.

Below 800 kW
More efficient than a turbine
Part load
Improvement of key parts, prechamber of combustion (licence)
Lower cost
Acquisition, use and maintenance
Context
Piston engine vs. gas turbine

Spark-ignition piston engines (or gasoline engines) and gas turbines have different advantages and disadvantages depending on the application.

↓Here are some of the advantages of spark-ignition engines over gas turbines.

Where each engine is most efficient
Power output, kW
BACH RANGE · 150–250 kW
Spark-ignition piston engine
Gas turbine
020040060080010001 200+

For well-established technical reasons, below 800 KW, a modern piston engine, designed specifically for aeronautics, will be more efficient than a turbine.

Key advantages

1
Part-load efficiency

Better efficiency at part load due to their ability to change their airflow and air-fuel ratio depending on load, which is not the case for gas turbines. Which they are more efficient at maximum load.

2
Lower cost

Lower cost of acquisition, use and maintenance.

3
Below 800 kW

For well-established technical reasons, below 800 KW, a modern piston engine, designed specifically for aeronautics, will be more efficient than a turbine. The evolution of the compression rates of the smallest of them shows their lower limit.

Further points

BACH M 200 engine
01
Rotation speed

A piston engine turns slower than a gas turbine, which has a consequence for the size of a reduction gear or an alternator.

02
Signature

The infrared signature and noise of a piston engine are advantageous compared to that of a turbine.

03
Altitude

When powered, the piston engine is less sensitive to altitude.

04
Application

The choice between a gasoline engine and a gas turbine depends on the specific application and performance requirements.

Technical comparison

Source: Bernard CERTAIN study
Global Weight Coefficient for 2 hours flight
BACH motorDiesel and 2-stroke pistonsGasoline pistonsTurbines
00.050.10.150.20.250.30.350.40.4500.20.40.60.811.21.41.61.822.20.20.40.60.811.2M/WSpecific consumption Cs, kg/kWhGWC, kg/kW4T Centurion 99 kW4T Centurion 257 kW4T Diesel 300 kW2T Gemini 1252T OPOC 220 kWLycoming 223 kWLycoming 107 kWSalmson 9Nm 150 kWWright 1820 1135 kWRTM322 2000 kWArriel 1D1 546 kWArtousteRR30BACH motorCs 0.20 · GWC 0.700.150.20.250.30.350.40.450.40.60.811.21.41.61.822.2GWC, kg/kWSpecific consumption Cs, kg/kWh12345678910111213BACH motorCs 0.20 · GWC 0.70
  1. 14T Centurion 99 kW
  2. 24T Centurion 257 kW
  3. 34T Diesel 300 kW
  4. 42T Gemini 125
  5. 52T OPOC 220 kW
  6. 6Lycoming 223 kW
  7. 7Lycoming 107 kW
  8. 8Salmson 9Nm 150 kW
  9. 9Wright 1820 1135 kW
  10. 10RTM322 2000 kW
  11. 11Arriel 1D1 546 kW
  12. 12Artouste
  13. 13RR30
This chart expresses the mass (engine + fuel) that must be taken into account for a 2-hour mission and per kW produced. It allows you to compare different engines. Dashed lines show constant engine mass-to-power ratio (M/W); lower and further left is better.

The weight of a Turbine, the sobriety of a Diesel, the performance of a Gasoline engine.